
I read an interesting article here that I felt compelled to respond to --
Beth Gilfeather's blog, The Candidate Advantage.
Great Article!
It is however unfortunate that such background checks are made -- the last company I worked for did a background check into Interpol, the International Police.
I requested the paperwork (as you have every right to request any background check done on you) so that I could actually see what sort of response and stories were reported about me.
No records came up --
Luckily in the web world, one is most often judged by the work they create. And, while most political laws that governed high school also govern the office, a person's past will show in the work they have created.
Good work which communicates a message -- buying, clicking, searching, learning -- is recognized instinctively -- a point which may elude some.
Dirt and rumors (and background checks) sometimes do not fully describe the truth of why someone was let go. Very often it is the pursuit of truth that leads one to be let go.
Think of how many sexual harassment cases occur reported or unreported in the workplace? Does this make one less desirable to hire because they harass workers?
Probably.
What about someone that hoards pencils and steals from the office supply closet? Are they fit to be hired?
Every job I've ever worked came to exist because of a close connection. No one wants to be humiliated, hurt, or slandered, and sometimes the truth is so good that it must be saved for a book, a play, and a movie.
Captain Gingerbeard once told me that being a programmer is not about solving problems, but it is rather about solving the perception of the problem.
If you see a skeleton from one angle, it just might be an angel in disguise.
Now where was I . . .?
i!










